<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Magazine &#187; Steve Jobs patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/tag/steve-jobs-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s “Steve Jobs” Patent Ruled Invalid in Non-Final Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/07/steve-jobs-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/07/steve-jobs-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Grush</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple touch patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uspto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=141984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the USPTO has now re-examined Apple's touch-screen patent first filed in April 2008 and granted nine months later. Based on a further look, the USPTO has now decided that 20 claims from the patent are invalid.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/07/steve-jobs-patent/">Apple&#8217;s “Steve Jobs” Patent Ruled Invalid in Non-Final Ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.mobilemag.com">Mobile Magazine</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-141985" title="US-patent" src="http://www.mobilemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/US-patent.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="499" /></p>
<p>It seems that the USPTO has now re-examined Apple&#8217;s touch-screen patent first filed in April 2008 and granted nine months later. Based on a further look, the USPTO has now decided that 20 claims from the patent are invalid.</p>
<p>This patent has often be referred to as the “Steve Jobs” patent, even by Apple lawyers. This very broad patent covers functionality that has to do with multi-touch screens and was actually leveraged in the Apple versus Samsung U.S. trial and an ITC dispute with Motorola.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that this is preliminary ruling, and is non-final at this point. This is also the second Apple patent to be tossed out, with late October&#8217;s decision to invalidate the rubber-banding bounce effect patent.</p>
<p>What do you think of the USPTO&#8217;s preliminary decision? Should the patent be thrown out or not?</p>
<p><a href="http://thenextweb.com/apps/2012/12/07/apple-steve-jobs-iphone-patent-preliminarily-ruled-invalid/">[ source ]</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/07/steve-jobs-patent/">Apple&#8217;s “Steve Jobs” Patent Ruled Invalid in Non-Final Ruling</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.mobilemag.com">Mobile Magazine</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/07/steve-jobs-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-05-24 14:47:02 by W3 Total Cache -->