Tizen vs Firefox OS vs Ubuntu: Battle for Fourth Place

tizen

The mobile market is quickly becoming very crowded. We already have iOS and Androd leading the pack, with Blackberry and Windows Phone (and even Windows 8 to some extent) duking it out for that precious “third place” position. Is there room for more contenders?

Like it or not, they are coming. While many alternative operating systems have existed for a long time now – like Symbian and Aliyun – many of these alternatives are only popular in the developing world and really don’t generate much excitement or hype, even if Symbian was pretty big during its height.

Ubuntu, Firefox OS and Tizen on the other hand are all receiving quite a bit of attention. So where do they sit so far?

Firefox OS

Firefox OS – Initial Impressions

At MWC 2013, Firefox OS in particular has seen quite a bit of love headed its way with the general consensus being that its current hardware isn’t exactly great, it has some bugs but underneath these problems is tons of potential.

The idea of an OS that is all about open web standards isn’t exactly new, and Firefox’s implementation is somewhat like a cross between Web OS and Chrome OS in that regard. It has apps and all of these apps can be locally stored and used offline, but they can also be used directly from the net if you don’t want to install the directly for whatever reason.

Who supports them?

Lot’s of folks are interested, actually. To name a few vendors, we have Alcatel, LG, ZTE, Sony and Huawei. Carriers include Deutsche Telekom, Telefonica and likely others that have yet to come forward officially.

Who is the target audience?

At launch, it will be the developing world. The current handsets we’ve seen are very basic with single-core processors and 256MB of RAM. That said, the company also plans to bring its OS to lower-end and even eventually mid-range markets in North America, Europe and elsewhere down the road, likely through carriers like Sony.

Ubuntu Touch

Ubuntu Touch – Initial Impressions

Ubuntu (unofficially referred to as Ubuntu Touch) too has been called out for having tons of potential with its very scalable OS that works with phones, tablets and computers. At its heart the OS is the same for all the platforms but presents different UIs depending on the situation. In fact, if you plug a monitor, keyboard and mouse into a Ubuntu phone you would be presented with the full desktop UI and experience.

There is plenty of promise for Ubuntu on mobiles. That said, the early preview of the tablet and phone has been considered less than great with many problems to work out between now and when it is actually ready. For example, mobile broadband currently isn’t supported. Again, it is an early preview and not meant to be a daily driver.

Who supports them?

Officially? No vendor or carrier has been announced. Still, there are likely at least a few vendors and possibly even a few carriers in the background that are working with Canonical to get Ubuntu out onto the market, but right now we haven’t had any official names dropped.

Who is the target audience?

Those that love customization, tweaking, power and scalability. In short, Ubuntu is the dream OS for the power user. The question is whether it can become a reality or if it really is nothing more than a pipe dream. At this point, it is hard to say for sure.

Tizen 2.0 – Initial Impressions

Last but not least is Tizen. Like the other two newcomers, its demonstrations haven’t been perfect just yet either. The device was seen at MWC running on Samsung test hardware and while it looked nice enough, the browser had stuttering issues during scrolling and other bugs to work out once again.

Who supports it?

Tizen has a lot of major backing, being developed by Samsung and Intel and many others such as SK Telecom, Sprint, Vodafone, Fujitsu, KT, NEC and Panasonic. Samsung has even added a little extra support in the form of blending parts of its older Bada OS into Tizen.

Who is the target audience?

Honestly for Samsung it is about not placing all of its eggs in one basket. Instead of completely relying on just Android, they now have Tizen and Windows Phone 8 as alternatives. The target audience with Tizen isn’t quite as clear as Ubuntu or Firefox OS.

From what we are seeing, Samsung and partners will likely produce handsets in both low, middle and high-end ranges so I guess the best answer is that the target audience is those who aren’t quite satisfied with Android, iOS or any of the other options on the market right now.

Conclusion

All three newcomers are far from finished products and have a long ways to go, but they all also have tons of promise. It remains unseen how much they will directly clash since they are somewhat have distinct plans in mind, but I’m sure there will still be some rivalry between the three as they attempt to emerge as a fourth place contender and even take a stab at competing against Blackberry and Windows Phone, perhaps.

Honestly, as it stands, Firefox OS seems to have the most launch partners ready to go, with Tizen not too far behind. As for Canonical? Right now their support is limited, though that could change. Of course its extremely open nature (even more so than Firefox OS) means that it might not see tons of love from many major carriers especially in countries like the United States.

What do you think of the three newcomers? Which do you feel has the best shot at really turning into something big? Conversely, do you feel the market is way too crowded for either of the three to make any major impact?


Posted in: Uncategorized

7 Comments

  1. Hal Motley says:

    I remember when I had an iPhone 3GS which was considered fast and had only a single-core CPU and 256MB of RAM, times change eh?

    Ultimately I don’t like Firefox OS and prefer Ubuntu Touch for two reasons:

    1. The UI is a ugly mixture of iOS, Android and something else.

    2. Only HTML5 works on Firefox OS while on Ubuntu there are native C++/QML applications that can take real advantage of the hardware.

    And that’s before the cool stuff like desktop convergence. I can see myself keeping an old Android phone just to run Ubuntu. :-)

  2. Ryan Northrup says:

    Wait, Ubuntu has more of an open nature than Firefox OS? I’m throwing my [citation needed] flag on this one; actually being open about things hasn’t been Canonical’s strong point as of late.

  3. John Wells says:

    I think you miss the point with Ubuntu OS is that — according to my understanding — it is not just “scalable” — it is the full OS. Plug the phone into a bigger monitor and it is the full desktop OS. A Windows 8-like approach, but arguably nicer.

    • Andrew Grush says:

      You are 100% correct John, and I should have been clearer.

      I meant scalable UI, in other words it changes (scales if you will) to fit the platform on hand.

      On phone it has phone UI, plug into a tablet base (if such ever exists) and it gives it the tablet UI, put keyboard/mouse/monitor with phone and it gives you PC UI. It is the same OS though in all forms (at the core and app levels, etc). It is similar in concept to Windows 8 but yes, takes the approach much further.

      That’s what I meant by scalable, but again I probably could have been clearer so for that I apologize.

      I absolutely love the idea of Ubuntu on mobiles but it isn’t there just yet. Tested on my Nexus 7, has bugs — but they will get them worked out I’m sure. My PC is also a Windows/Ubuntu dual-boot.

      Anyhow, thanks for commenting! :)

Leave a Comment