<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Surface Pro Reviews Hit the Net, Opinions Seem Mixed So Far</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/02/07/microsoft-surface-pro-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/02/07/microsoft-surface-pro-reviews/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Grush</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/02/07/microsoft-surface-pro-reviews/#comment-64873</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Grush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=145294#comment-64873</guid>
		<description>Sorry if you felt I covered the more positive ones. I meant to have one positive, one neutral and one negative to give a sampling of each side-- but looking at it, you are right. My &#039;neutral&#039; one wasn&#039;t that neutral, and my negative one wasn&#039;t that negative. 

Doesn&#039;t really give the most accurate picture as is, so sorry about that. I&#039;ll edit to vary opinions a little better. :) 

Thanks and have a good one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if you felt I covered the more positive ones. I meant to have one positive, one neutral and one negative to give a sampling of each side&#8211; but looking at it, you are right. My &#8216;neutral&#8217; one wasn&#8217;t that neutral, and my negative one wasn&#8217;t that negative. </p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t really give the most accurate picture as is, so sorry about that. I&#8217;ll edit to vary opinions a little better. :) </p>
<p>Thanks and have a good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coutch</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/02/07/microsoft-surface-pro-reviews/#comment-64871</link>
		<dc:creator>Coutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=145294#comment-64871</guid>
		<description>.. no Apple fanboy here, but you are really cherry-picking the reviews for favorable content! If you&#039;re paid by Microsoft to put in print only the minority opinion of this machine, shouldn&#039;t you tell us that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.. no Apple fanboy here, but you are really cherry-picking the reviews for favorable content! If you&#8217;re paid by Microsoft to put in print only the minority opinion of this machine, shouldn&#8217;t you tell us that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-05-21 06:34:30 by W3 Total Cache -->