Comments on: Google Plus Second Most Popular Social Network http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/01/28/google-plus-second-place/ Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you'd expect. Sun, 19 May 2013 22:40:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Olive http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/01/28/google-plus-second-place/#comment-65034 Olive Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:39:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=144644#comment-65034 Marc razia Do you spend all your waking hours going to all web articles on the Internet defending google plus and bashing Facebook? Do you work -- maybe in google? Do you have family? Wife and kids? Do you a life?? The British company who came up with the data already conceded that the active users includes people forced to register with google plus. Marc razia
Do you spend all your waking hours going to all web articles on the Internet defending google plus and bashing Facebook?
Do you work — maybe in google? Do you have family? Wife and kids? Do you a life??
The British company who came up with the data already conceded that the active users includes people forced to register with google plus.

]]> By: Marc Razia http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/01/28/google-plus-second-place/#comment-64643 Marc Razia Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:18:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=144644#comment-64643 Kimi - you need to do your research. The study specifically says they tracked ONLY users who have contributed to the network (sharing, posting, +1'ing). These are NOT total registered users. And as far as being forced, I can't tell you how many times I'd been forced to log in to a Facebook account that I never use just to leave a comment on an article that had nothing to do with Facebook. Facebook states they count that as an "active" user. G+ does not. Just because you don't think G+ is growing doesn't make it so. Kimi – you need to do your research. The study specifically says they tracked ONLY users who have contributed to the network (sharing, posting, +1′ing). These are NOT total registered users.

And as far as being forced, I can’t tell you how many times I’d been forced to log in to a Facebook account that I never use just to leave a comment on an article that had nothing to do with Facebook. Facebook states they count that as an “active” user. G+ does not.

Just because you don’t think G+ is growing doesn’t make it so.

]]> By: nattapol sresook http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/01/28/google-plus-second-place/#comment-64514 nattapol sresook Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:19:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=144644#comment-64514 OMG I love google+ OMG I love google+

]]> By: totnuckers http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/01/28/google-plus-second-place/#comment-64511 totnuckers Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:18:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=144644#comment-64511 "until i was FORCED to join simply so i could leave comments, reviews, and other things" leave comments and reviews where? “until i was FORCED to join simply so i could leave comments, reviews, and other things”

leave comments and reviews where?

]]> By: Kimi http://www.mobilemag.com/2013/01/28/google-plus-second-place/#comment-64507 Kimi Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:28:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=144644#comment-64507 I think google+ is getting a jump simply because they're forcing you to be in plus now to do things like leave reviews, which never was part of plus before. I ignored the "join google plus" messages for a year, until i was FORCED to join simply so i could leave comments, reviews, and other things that i USE to be able to do WITHOUT google+. Without the mandated joining for such things, i'm positive google+ wouldn't have half of it's registered users. I think google+ is getting a jump simply because they’re forcing you to be in plus now to do things like leave reviews, which never was part of plus before. I ignored the “join google plus” messages for a year, until i was FORCED to join simply so i could leave comments, reviews, and other things that i USE to be able to do WITHOUT google+. Without the mandated joining for such things, i’m positive google+ wouldn’t have half of it’s registered users.

]]>