Comments on: Huawei Propels Itself to Become 3rd Biggest Smartphone Maker

By: Michael Kwan

Michael Kwan — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:13:00 +0000

That’s exactly what happened with HTC of Taiwan, which used to be the OEM/ODM for all sorts of Windows Mobile smartphones not that long ago.

By: WHAT-U-GOT-ANDREW?

WHAT-U-GOT-ANDREW? — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:54:00 +0000

u r a nerd

By: Andrew_Grush

Andrew_Grush — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:52:00 +0000

The phone in the picture is the massive Huawei Ascend Mate, a 6.1-inch phablet designed to compete with products like the Note 2.

By: Paul Johnson

Paul Johnson — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:22:00 +0000

The Galaxy S3 is only better selling if you count the constant “2 for 1″ deals that a lot of carriers offer. Samsung is sacrificing profits for market share, so don’t tell me that Apple is losing profits to Samsung, as your post implies.

By: olngrumpy

olngrumpy — Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:04:00 +0000

Apple products are now a mainstream product – nothing exiting about pushing vitual buttons no more complex than operating a tv remote controller or a microwave oven. It’s for grandparents, parents, and people who don’t know how how to use a smartphone, or what to do with them, but want one never-the-less.

By: olngrumpy

olngrumpy — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:54:00 +0000

Considering that Apple products are only a “nameplate” and made by the other big manufacturers like Samsung and FoxCon. We have enabled Asia; taught them how, gave them manufacturing knowhow and capacity, and paid for all of it. Why is anyone surprised that they now shed the nameplates and start marketing themselves – like who need Apple as a middleman.

By: Rick Parker

Rick Parker — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:40:00 +0000

The iphone already is relatively inexpensive, especially the 4. Even the 5 is cheaper than the superior (and better selling) Galaxy S3. Revenue growth will continue to slow unless they catch up on size, speed and features. It’s not the ipod, where they could do a release once a year because they own the music format and there was no competition. Jobs would never have allowed a watered down, ‘cheap’ iPhone.

By: Creed

Creed — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:25:00 +0000

Apple would never sell a cheapo iPhone. It would tarnish their brand image. If you can’t afford an iPhone than you buy and android. This makes the iPhone exclusively to people who have the money and the desire to own a more expensive phone that can essentially do the same things the cheapo phone can. Its all about image. That is why their are no $300 macbooks but countless PC’s that cost about that much.

By: Mitch Taylor

Mitch Taylor — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:49:00 +0000

Dosent anyone realize who these folks are?.. understand them They are what we Americans are trying to keep out of our data systems. Not good!! This is a major conspiracy..

By: jcarob

jcarob — Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:46:00 +0000

Is that a tiny hand or a huge phone pictured above? At some point the ever increasing phone size becomes absurd. Maybe the absurd has arrived.