<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Switching to Yearly Updates? Windows Blue Said to Be in Alpha Testing Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/27/windows-blue-alpha-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/27/windows-blue-alpha-testing/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrantsson</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/12/27/windows-blue-alpha-testing/#comment-63596</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrantsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=143125#comment-63596</guid>
		<description>The current Windows Update is rather more frequent than that, and it releases major updates (e.g. new versions of Internet Explorer). Why stop on a yearly basis, why not make it part of WU altogether. Such updates (rather than upgrades) would deliver major changes in smaller steps. 
In my opinion, a constantly evolving OS is better than the current stepped approach. I think the traditional notion of boxed Windows platforms, or major versions, rather should become one evolving body of technologies. It&#039;s just more natural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current Windows Update is rather more frequent than that, and it releases major updates (e.g. new versions of Internet Explorer). Why stop on a yearly basis, why not make it part of WU altogether. Such updates (rather than upgrades) would deliver major changes in smaller steps.<br />
In my opinion, a constantly evolving OS is better than the current stepped approach. I think the traditional notion of boxed Windows platforms, or major versions, rather should become one evolving body of technologies. It&#8217;s just more natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-05-25 17:56:34 by W3 Total Cache -->