<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interested in Microsoft Surface? Should you get Surface RT or Surface PRO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-61776</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-61776</guid>
		<description>Like the RT.  Wouldn&#039;t buy one because of lack of backward compatibility.


The Pro satisfies 90% of my needs.  Like the size and weight.  Keyboard and trackpad essential.  Want more RAM and Memory or the ability to upgrade it.  I hate touchscreens so W8 is not a must.  May go with a Samsung series 9 with W7.


I&#039;d love to see a version of this without the touch screen and with a hinged attached real keyboard with a real track pad running windows 7.  That would make it a very nice ultrabook.  It is a less than shining tablet in all versions.  Why not cut a few bucks on the display and OS and give us a compact, light Ultrabook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the RT.  Wouldn&#8217;t buy one because of lack of backward compatibility.</p>
<p>The Pro satisfies 90% of my needs.  Like the size and weight.  Keyboard and trackpad essential.  Want more RAM and Memory or the ability to upgrade it.  I hate touchscreens so W8 is not a must.  May go with a Samsung series 9 with W7.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see a version of this without the touch screen and with a hinged attached real keyboard with a real track pad running windows 7.  That would make it a very nice ultrabook.  It is a less than shining tablet in all versions.  Why not cut a few bucks on the display and OS and give us a compact, light Ultrabook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SongySan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-61424</link>
		<dc:creator>SongySan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-61424</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but then you&#039;re stuck with a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but then you&#8217;re stuck with a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrandPoobah</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60786</link>
		<dc:creator>GrandPoobah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60786</guid>
		<description>Brought an RT and LOVE IT but since I use OneNote, the handwriting capability is key for me.  So I will return it and get a Pro.  Outside of that, Outlook is my life.  RT doesn&#039;t come with Outlook.  Love what MSFT has designed.  Are they becoming cool?  Will have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brought an RT and LOVE IT but since I use OneNote, the handwriting capability is key for me.  So I will return it and get a Pro.  Outside of that, Outlook is my life.  RT doesn&#8217;t come with Outlook.  Love what MSFT has designed.  Are they becoming cool?  Will have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dre' Reavis</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60779</link>
		<dc:creator>Dre' Reavis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60779</guid>
		<description>Surface RT.  Less weight, lower entry cost, no Malware/Spyware to worry about, less system noise, less heat...and it does everything I want a tablet to do PLUS run office and the occasional productivity app that&#039;s not from Microsoft.   Expand the storage to 96 GB...hook up blue tooth keyboard and mouse...connect my Sony A200 camera to the USB connector...   I&#039;m good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surface RT.  Less weight, lower entry cost, no Malware/Spyware to worry about, less system noise, less heat&#8230;and it does everything I want a tablet to do PLUS run office and the occasional productivity app that&#8217;s not from Microsoft.   Expand the storage to 96 GB&#8230;hook up blue tooth keyboard and mouse&#8230;connect my Sony A200 camera to the USB connector&#8230;   I&#8217;m good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60776</guid>
		<description>Neither, since it appears that neither have GPS. That&#039;s a deal breaker for me :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither, since it appears that neither have GPS. That&#8217;s a deal breaker for me :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60723</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60723</guid>
		<description>I opted for the RT now, and the Pro later.  I&#039;ll give the RT to the kid, or wife at that time.  Having the RT so far has been a real treat though.  If the Pro is anything close to usability of the RT it will be probably the best portable computing device on the Planet, hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opted for the RT now, and the Pro later.  I&#8217;ll give the RT to the kid, or wife at that time.  Having the RT so far has been a real treat though.  If the Pro is anything close to usability of the RT it will be probably the best portable computing device on the Planet, hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60722</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60722</guid>
		<description>You can get 1/2 the Mac for that price.  The price is starting at $800 anyway, well within the price of a top tier ultraportable.  This machine will rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get 1/2 the Mac for that price.  The price is starting at $800 anyway, well within the price of a top tier ultraportable.  This machine will rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60695</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60695</guid>
		<description>Definitely getting the pro. @ author you forgot to mention that the pro has the igpu Intel HD 4000 which has vastly greater graphics performance than the GMA found in RT tablets. Essentially even for those who like PC games, it can definitely run most pc games with playable fps with low/med settings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely getting the pro. @ author you forgot to mention that the pro has the igpu Intel HD 4000 which has vastly greater graphics performance than the GMA found in RT tablets. Essentially even for those who like PC games, it can definitely run most pc games with playable fps with low/med settings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60646</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60646</guid>
		<description>I want the pro at $400. That means I might have to wait a decade or so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want the pro at $400. That means I might have to wait a decade or so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LS</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/11/05/microsoft-surface-rt-vs-pro/#comment-60623</link>
		<dc:creator>LS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=140120#comment-60623</guid>
		<description>Will buy surface RT for Christmas and hope my husband will ditch it for the PRO in 2013--then I can have the RT ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will buy surface RT for Christmas and hope my husband will ditch it for the PRO in 2013&#8211;then I can have the RT ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-05-23 21:32:35 by W3 Total Cache -->