<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Infrared Wireless Capable of Delivering 1Gbps Data Transfer Rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/10/04/infrared-wireless-capable-of-delivering-1gbps-data-transfer-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/10/04/infrared-wireless-capable-of-delivering-1gbps-data-transfer-rates/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: me again</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/10/04/infrared-wireless-capable-of-delivering-1gbps-data-transfer-rates/#comment-59448</link>
		<dc:creator>me again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=138823#comment-59448</guid>
		<description>Just to add to my lame comment above: We use bluetooth for short wavelengths of radio, which is good for short distances, it takes very little power and that&#039;s why it is slow.. by design, it&#039;s good for mice that are wireless and want to conserve battery 1000% better. 
We also (obviously) got the more powerful wireless radio waves, some go hundreds of miles, some work just within peoples homes, these all go through walls, go around corners, work in someones pocket.. etc.. infrared, wouldn&#039;t.. That&#039;s the reason we aren&#039;t using lasers right now for this, NASA can use lasers for wireless, to satellites and to other planets, because there&#039;s nothing in its way, it&#039;s empty.. unfortunately on earth, there are obstacles we have in our way</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add to my lame comment above: We use bluetooth for short wavelengths of radio, which is good for short distances, it takes very little power and that&#8217;s why it is slow.. by design, it&#8217;s good for mice that are wireless and want to conserve battery 1000% better.<br />
We also (obviously) got the more powerful wireless radio waves, some go hundreds of miles, some work just within peoples homes, these all go through walls, go around corners, work in someones pocket.. etc.. infrared, wouldn&#8217;t.. That&#8217;s the reason we aren&#8217;t using lasers right now for this, NASA can use lasers for wireless, to satellites and to other planets, because there&#8217;s nothing in its way, it&#8217;s empty.. unfortunately on earth, there are obstacles we have in our way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ok</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/10/04/infrared-wireless-capable-of-delivering-1gbps-data-transfer-rates/#comment-59447</link>
		<dc:creator>ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=138823#comment-59447</guid>
		<description>Who cares? can&#039;t go through walls..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? can&#8217;t go through walls..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-05-21 06:56:06 by W3 Total Cache -->