Comments on: Rumored Samsung Galaxy Note 2 Competitor: LG Vu 2

By: yip

yip — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:27:00 +0000

With a Piss poor 16GB storage option, it’s not a competitor, the only way super phones can win hard core mobile freaks over us having 64 and 128GB models

By: waka

waka — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:31:00 +0000

I love the original vu. I will support lg and get this vu 2 when released on Verizon.

By: rabbit

rabbit — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:24:00 +0000

Lower and slower specs.

No stylus = not a competitor.

Pass.

By: Allen

Allen — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:36:00 +0000

If they’re going to make a phone that looks that ugly, it should at least have great specs. Ugly phone with lesser components? Pass

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:46:00 +0000

A competitor to the iPhone 5 — Maybe.

But the Note 2 is a different level altogether.

By: Armando Eraso

Armando Eraso — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:30:00 +0000

This phone is not even close. This phone is a joke. The Galaxy Note 2 is at another level.

By: eccoo damo

eccoo damo — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:39:00 +0000

You have to be kidding to even put the word competitor in this article and hell no, I would never consider the LG because it’s not even in the same league as the Note 2.

By: Daniel Ojinaga

Daniel Ojinaga — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 01:42:00 +0000

Hell to the NO!!!

By: reeftivo

reeftivo — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:02:00 +0000

not much of a competitor. With ICS, smaller processor, smaller front facing camera, dual core instead of quad, smaller battery, it doesn’t compare! Looks like a brick too