<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari For Windows Seemingly Vanishes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/25/safari-for-windows-seemingly-vanishes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/25/safari-for-windows-seemingly-vanishes/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/25/safari-for-windows-seemingly-vanishes/#comment-57188</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=135659#comment-57188</guid>
		<description>In all honesty does anyone really believe Safari is that popular on Windows. Total World Safari use is only around 4%. At best Windows portion of that 4% would possibly be .5% Is it worth Apple spending resources to port Safari to Windows? Especially with Windows 8 coming out? No. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all honesty does anyone really believe Safari is that popular on Windows. Total World Safari use is only around 4%. At best Windows portion of that 4% would possibly be .5% Is it worth Apple spending resources to port Safari to Windows? Especially with Windows 8 coming out? No. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-06-19 12:41:41 by W3 Total Cache -->