<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 5 Getting Samsung Exynos-Based Quad Core A6 Processor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/06/iphone-5-getting-samsung-exynos-based-quad-core-a6-processor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/06/iphone-5-getting-samsung-exynos-based-quad-core-a6-processor/</link>
	<description>Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you&#039;d expect.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabby Joven</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/06/iphone-5-getting-samsung-exynos-based-quad-core-a6-processor/#comment-58604</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabby Joven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=134878#comment-58604</guid>
		<description>So now Apple officially calls it iPhone 5, now what?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now Apple officially calls it iPhone 5, now what?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Godfrey</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/06/iphone-5-getting-samsung-exynos-based-quad-core-a6-processor/#comment-58578</link>
		<dc:creator>Godfrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=134878#comment-58578</guid>
		<description>Turns out apple called it the iPhone 5. You fuckwit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out apple called it the iPhone 5. You fuckwit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/06/iphone-5-getting-samsung-exynos-based-quad-core-a6-processor/#comment-57347</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=134878#comment-57347</guid>
		<description>The iPhone &quot;5&quot; is what most people have begun to refer to it as namely because for some reason or another is was decided by someone (who? Don&#039;t know) that iPhone 4S was simply an upgrade to the fifth generation iPhone (iphone 4) and not a whole generation leap.  But yes, for the record, the next iPhone is the sixth iPhone.

There isn&#039;t one particular media outlet calling it iPhone 5, it&#039;s most online publications so no need to rudely attack anyone. Think of the naming like this - Microsoft&#039;s Windows 7 isn&#039;t REALLY Windows 7 since there have been ten major Windows products (not including Windows CE-based projects). As Shakespeare once wrote, &quot;What&#039;s in a name? That which we call a rose by another name would smell as sweet&quot;.

To be honest, the next iPhone will likely be called &quot;the next iPhone&quot; (just like they did with the iPad), making the whole naming convention irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPhone &#8220;5&#8243; is what most people have begun to refer to it as namely because for some reason or another is was decided by someone (who? Don&#8217;t know) that iPhone 4S was simply an upgrade to the fifth generation iPhone (iphone 4) and not a whole generation leap.  But yes, for the record, the next iPhone is the sixth iPhone.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t one particular media outlet calling it iPhone 5, it&#8217;s most online publications so no need to rudely attack anyone. Think of the naming like this &#8211; Microsoft&#8217;s Windows 7 isn&#8217;t REALLY Windows 7 since there have been ten major Windows products (not including Windows CE-based projects). As Shakespeare once wrote, &#8220;What&#8217;s in a name? That which we call a rose by another name would smell as sweet&#8221;.</p>
<p>To be honest, the next iPhone will likely be called &#8220;the next iPhone&#8221; (just like they did with the iPad), making the whole naming convention irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voice_of_reason</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilemag.com/2012/07/06/iphone-5-getting-samsung-exynos-based-quad-core-a6-processor/#comment-57339</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice_of_reason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=134878#comment-57339</guid>
		<description>Let me spell this out for you muppet &#039;journalists.&#039; 
iPhone, iPhone 3G, 3GS, 4, 4s.
The 4S was the *fifth* generation. Therefore, the next iPhone will be the iPhone 6, as opposed to the iPhone 5 as you ignoramus&#039; have come to call it. I&#039;m disgusted that I actually have to count to six for you fuckwits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me spell this out for you muppet &#8216;journalists.&#8217;<br />
iPhone, iPhone 3G, 3GS, 4, 4s.<br />
The 4S was the *fifth* generation. Therefore, the next iPhone will be the iPhone 6, as opposed to the iPhone 5 as you ignoramus&#8217; have come to call it. I&#8217;m disgusted that I actually have to count to six for you fuckwits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.mobilemag.com @ 2013-06-18 15:37:46 by W3 Total Cache -->