Glasses-free 3D safe, unless you’re using Jonathan Post’s prototype


One of the big drawbacks surrounding 3DTVs are the active shutter glasses that must be worn for 3D viewing, running up to $200 per pair. A glasses-free 3DTV technology has begun circulating the internet in a video hosted at JonathanPost.com, who we don’t know much about. The experiment was Conducted by Luis Carone and managed by Daniel Dias, in it is French director François Vogel.

In the video, Vogel attaches electrodes to his head, one on each temple, and then synchs each electrode with a remote control. Once he starts the program his eyelids blink constantly until he shuts off the system. It appears that the electrodes on Vogel’s head replace the function of active shutter glasses by simulating a similar effect.

The way 3D works is the brain combines two separate images, one meant to be seen by the right eye and one to be seen by the left eye.  Active shutter glasses sync with the TV (120Hz in this case) and darken the eye that is not meant to see the image. According to Jean-Marie Hanssens, an optometrist who teaches at the University of Montréal, this happens about 64 times per second. After viewing Post’s video, Hanssens informed us that it is possible.  “I think this could be possible because electrodes can make eyelids blink but I don’t think that the frequency is fast enough to get the same quality as active shutter glasses.” Hanssens said our eye muscles wouldn’t be up for it. “Blinking as fast as in the web video can generate various eye problems such as dry eye, corneal and lid irritations, lid spasms,” Hanssens said.

In his research, Hanssens uses 3D to test binocular vision. He also studies the impact of 3D vision on posture and subjective discomfort by using 3D glasses and a Full Immersive Virtual Environment, a big room where the walls and ground are the screens. Hanssens said that 3D movies are not harmful to our eyes, but some short-term effects can include headaches, visual fatigue, nausea, dizziness and blurred vision. The effects can last a few hours, but so far researchers haven’t found any long-term effects.

Nintendo is releasing their glasses-free 3DS on March 27th. Nintendo released a warning that children under six shouldn’t play the 3DS in 3D mode, and it will have a parental control that can lock the device in 2D mode. According to Nintendo, the 3D could have a potential impact on the growth of children’s eyes.

However, the American Optometric Association suggests that 3D viewing may help uncover subtle eye disorders that if left uncorrected, can lead to learning difficulties. 3D viewing requires coordinated eye muscles that maintain alignment of both eyes, and the brain must be able to focus where the eyes are aimed. Slight problems with these skills can lead to an inability to view 3D, but can also affect reading comprehension.

“In real life, eyes are adjusting their focus to different objects depending on the distance, this is called accommodation,” Hanssens said. “In 3D screens, objects appear on the same plane (the screen) which can disturb the relation between accomodation and fusion of right and left images. People who have a lazy eye due to different conditions may not have stereovision.”

So while there is no medical evidence that 3D can damage eyes, it could work to uncover eye issues that haven’t presented themselves yet. Hanssens said that people with these issues are unable to view 3D properly, but see it as a 2D movie with fewer contrasts. Hanssens recommends these people, especially kids, should consult an optometrist and get an eye exam. But Hanssens cautions that 3D shouldn’t be used as a screening tool.

“The problem is that a child who never experiences 3D vision in his life will not be aware that he is not able to see 3D effects,” Hanssens said. “He will only report that ‘a 3D movie is not a big deal.’”

Toshiba displayed glasses-free 3D TVs at CES 2011. Toshiba’s 3D TV is built with a thin sheet of small lenses in front of the display, which splits light from the screen and sends it to nine points in front of the TV. Viewers will have to sit in the exact spot of one of these nine areas to be able to experience the 3D.  Toshiba claims the TVs will be available in North America by April.

As for Post’s prototype, we have yet to see if it’s a hoax or not. Jonathan Post did not respond for comment.


Posted in: Uncategorized

11 Comments

  1. charlie says:

    BOLLLLocks. Also the lectrods would retail at 200 so wouldnt solve the key issue

  2. thenoic says:

    Hi, i’m french, and this is a pure fake ;)

  3. megisobel says:

    It looks almost like an optical illusion when his eyes started blinking that fast. And they were blinking out of sync! Very odd to look at….but fascinating from a scientific viewpoint. As long as it didn’t hurt my eyes, I think I would quite enjoy trying this technique out.

  4. dpark says:

    I can’t imagine this replacing the glasses, it has to be uncomfortable, if not while viewing, immediately after. I am sure there will be some short and long term side effects.

  5. alee says:

    Well I’ll go out on a limb and say that if it is tested and proved safe without damage it looks like the way forward. Or even modified contact lenses…

  6. Will says:

    now way is that good for your eyes. He looks like his eyes are having seizures. I think I’ll stick with the glasses. I wear glasses already, so what difference does it make if I have a second pair on top? I hope he doesn’t have complications later in life for over using those things.

  7. Cally says:

    This looks promising as wearing those 3D glasses can be uncomfortable, however as the video did not show what it was like for the presenter I wouldn’t know how good the 3D was he was watching. I really don’t think that 3D TV will catch on until more research into effects on the eyes is carried out.

  8. jenwin says:

    I think It would be an uncomfortable experience, not just for the feel of the experience, but also the medical safety related issues would be a worry.

  9. Andy says:

    I dont know this new product makes me a bit skeptical, I mean the presentation didnt really show you what it looked like from his point of view. Aside from that the constant blinking he did was just weird all together. I think they should do some studies on this to rule out possible eye damage before anythings released. None the less it would be interesting to see this in stores.

  10. Alex says:

    If I had to wear that to watch 3D movies, I’d be too tired to enjoy the movie. While it’s an interesting idea, it seems way to complicated, dangerous, and annoying.

  11. Krys says:

    Weirdddddd. I don’t think I would risk trying that. I would much prefer wearing the standard 3d glasses. I feel like my eyes would strain from the constant blinking and my head would end up hurting. Interesting though.

Leave a Comment