Comments on: Nasa to send Man to Mars http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/ Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you'd expect. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:19:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Luka KRAGUJEVAC http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-56360 Luka KRAGUJEVAC Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:37:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-56360 I want to go on Mars,please pick me!! I want to go on Mars,please pick me!!

]]> By: mike http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-54484 mike Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:57:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-54484 Please send Justin Bieber And leave him ther!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please send Justin Bieber And leave him ther!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]> By: cw http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-47104 cw Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:11:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-47104 they already have they already have

]]> By: Plutonium http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-45722 Plutonium Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:02:00 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-45722 is good to send men on the mars is good to send men on the mars

]]> By: John Christopher Sunol http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-31465 John Christopher Sunol Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:36:59 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-31465 Yes with the present technology it could take 3 years, but with other technology such as scram jet and others to come in the future the journey could be takdn down to 6 months. Remember in 1788 when Captain Phillip first came to Australia from England it took 6-9 months for a sialing ship to get to Australai from the UK, and itw as a 18 month round trip staying only one day in Sydney. You left Portsmith to Ausrlaia you expected to be away for years. Now it is only a 24 hour service. Mars is just the same, it might be a 3-4 year round trip now staying only one day, but who knows with new technology happening it could be a one week trip tfhere and one week trip back in only 10years time. Yes with the present technology it could take 3 years, but with other technology such as scram jet and others to come in the future the journey could be takdn down to 6 months.

Remember in 1788 when Captain Phillip first came to Australia from England it took 6-9 months for a sialing ship to get to Australai from the UK, and itw as a 18 month round trip staying only one day in Sydney. You left Portsmith to Ausrlaia you expected to be away for years. Now it is only a 24 hour service.

Mars is just the same, it might be a 3-4 year round trip now staying only one day, but who knows with new technology happening it could be a one week trip tfhere and one week trip back in only 10years time.

]]> By: Bruce M http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-30214 Bruce M Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:36:24 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-30214 The problem with all these plans to go to Mars is that they require a round trip. They want to send a few people there and bring them back. Don't they realize that's a three year mission. The distances are just too great and the time is far too long. The only real solution is to sent a group of people there and colonize. Later, when we have the technology and monetary backing, we can send more people and others can rotate back to Earth. But, for the first five or six years the mission should be a colony. The ship would have to be large and carry a self contained environment. Items such as communication satellites and observation satellites could be brought along to make the colony as advanced as possible. Supply missions could provide the colony with all the consumables and technology it needed to maintain itself. In this way we would be like the British and Portuguese of the seventeenth century. It would be a whole new "Age Of Discovery". The mission would require all sorts of different people with skills that you don't normally associate with space travel. In that way everyone would have the potential of going into space. The problem with all these plans to go to Mars is that they require a round trip. They want to send a few people there and bring them back. Don’t they realize that’s a three year mission. The distances are just too great and the time is far too long. The only real solution is to sent a group of people there and colonize. Later, when we have the technology and monetary backing, we can send more people and others can rotate back to Earth. But, for the first five or six years the mission should be a colony. The ship would have to be large and carry a self contained environment. Items such as communication satellites and observation satellites could be brought along to make the colony as advanced as possible. Supply missions could provide the colony with all the consumables and technology it needed to maintain itself. In this way we would be like the British and Portuguese of the seventeenth century. It would be a whole new “Age Of Discovery”. The mission would require all sorts of different people with skills that you don’t normally associate with space travel. In that way everyone would have the potential of going into space.

]]> By: Phone System Tech http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-29802 Phone System Tech Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:09:46 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-29802 We are far better positioned to send man to mars than we were when we went to the moon. We have the technology right now, all that's missing is the will by those in power. Obama's decision is a step in the right direction and at the very least, gets the idea out to the public where it can accumulate support. We are far better positioned to send man to mars than we were when we went to the moon. We have the technology right now, all that’s missing is the will by those in power. Obama’s decision is a step in the right direction and at the very least, gets the idea out to the public where it can accumulate support.

]]> By: Tom P http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-10391 Tom P Wed, 12 May 2010 04:04:38 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-10391 Why are so many of you trashing Obama? Obama would not be so socialist, if the stupid public voted for the Democrats, instead of Bush, who trashed our country, totally, plus most of the world, for that matter. Mankind does have an obligation to take care of our own. I have been to very poor countries where unemployment is 40%. People there eat better than most Americans. Shame on Us. We are too selfish and stupid; case closed. We will lose our freedoms, very soon; just like the Ancient Greeks did in 1452. We better go to Mars; and soon. The way we are trashing our planet, it won't be long before we all hv to leave Earth to survive! Why are so many of you trashing Obama?
Obama would not be so socialist, if the stupid public voted for the Democrats, instead of Bush, who trashed our country, totally, plus most of the world, for that matter.
Mankind does have an obligation to take care of our own. I have been to very poor countries where unemployment is 40%. People there eat better than most Americans.
Shame on Us. We are too selfish and stupid; case closed.
We will lose our freedoms, very soon; just like the Ancient Greeks did in 1452.
We better go to Mars; and soon. The way we are trashing our planet, it won’t be long before we all hv to leave Earth to survive!

]]> By: ryaneaux http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-6070 ryaneaux Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:32:25 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-6070 "The Republicants are some of the most backward thinking lot of people I think I will ever come across in my entire life. They do not want to go to Mars because they are afraid we will ship them there and be done with them." Before you start criticizing NASA's programs and their rocket scientists' you should really learn how to spell republicans, so you don't look so stupid. Also, Republicans are not the problem. Obama is. He is more concerned with creating a socialist America than anything to do with the space program. “The Republicants are some of the most backward thinking lot of people I think I will ever come across in my entire life. They do not want to go to Mars because they are afraid we will ship them there and be done with them.”

Before you start criticizing NASA’s programs and their rocket scientists’ you should really learn how to spell republicans, so you don’t look so stupid. Also, Republicans are not the problem. Obama is. He is more concerned with creating a socialist America than anything to do with the space program.

]]> By: dave http://www.mobilemag.com/2010/02/25/nasa-to-send-man-to-mars/#comment-5964 dave Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:06:25 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=72405#comment-5964 The article makes sense to me, its not rocket science. Bolden did say they will send astronauts to Mars. They do say many things tho, so its up to you how much you want to believe. The article makes sense to me, its not rocket science. Bolden did say they will send astronauts to Mars. They do say many things tho, so its up to you how much you want to believe.

]]>