http://www.mobilemag.com/2009/08/20/windows-mobile-6-5-and-windows-mobile-7-to-co-exist/ Gadgets, Smartphones, Android Tablets, iPhone, iPad and all the latest tech you'd expect. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.mobilemag.com/2009/08/20/windows-mobile-6-5-and-windows-mobile-7-to-co-exist/#comment-1939 brujo j garza Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:58:29 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=65774#comment-1939 maybe we need to co-exist! now lets hold hands and sing give peace a... maybe we need to co-exist! now lets hold hands and sing give peace a…

]]> http://www.mobilemag.com/2009/08/20/windows-mobile-6-5-and-windows-mobile-7-to-co-exist/#comment-1405 Posts about google android as of August 20, 2009 | Neto Cury Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:02:37 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=65774#comment-1405 [...] its capability to display pages properly, but RIM is working on a major overhaul of the software. Windows Mobile 6.5 and Windows Mobile 7 to Co-Exist? - mobilemag.com 08/20/2009 Normally, when you see different versions of the same operating system, [...] [...] its capability to display pages properly, but RIM is working on a major overhaul of the software. Windows Mobile 6.5 and Windows Mobile 7 to Co-Exist? – mobilemag.com 08/20/2009 Normally, when you see different versions of the same operating system, [...]

]]> http://www.mobilemag.com/2009/08/20/windows-mobile-6-5-and-windows-mobile-7-to-co-exist/#comment-1401 HereAndNow Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:36:27 +0000 http://www.mobilemag.com/?p=65774#comment-1401 By Q4 2010, web apps are likely to be the predominant way to develop functionality for smartphones, especially when HTML5, BONDI, etc. are widely supported. This will make the underlying OS largely irrelevant and certainly something less attractive to license/pay for. By Q4 2010, web apps are likely to be the predominant way to develop functionality for smartphones, especially when HTML5, BONDI, etc. are widely supported. This will make the underlying OS largely irrelevant and certainly something less attractive to license/pay for.

]]>